Is ATF Expanding its Multiple Sales Reporting Requirement Nationwide?

David Codrea of the Gun Rights Examiner has, once again, performed a major service for the movement by calling attention to a proposed ATF rule buried in the Federal Register without any fanfare or announcement, which may have far-reaching consequences.

The rule, numbered OMB Number 1140-0100, says, and we quote the sentence in its entirety:

The purpose of this information collection is to require Federal Firearms Licensees to report multiple sales or other dispositions whenever the licensee sells or otherwise disposes of two or more rifles within any five consecutive business days with the following characteristics:  (1) Semi-automatic; (2) a caliber greater than .22; and (c) the ability to accept a detachable magazine.

FK – Considering the outcome of yesterday’s elections we need to demand any republicrat that wants our vote this fall promise to repeal all the ‘gun laws,’ shut down the BATF Nazi trash and arrest and try for treason and execute all who work for ‘gun control’ or we vote for the commies. The commies taking over completely is what it will take to get ‘Joe don’t give a damn just get me a beer or a savior’ off his ass long enough to maybe man up and see what will be required to save what’s left of this nation and restore the Bill of Rights. If not, they fully deserve what’s coming and may they suffer horribly in this world for their apathy and cowardice.

Gun Sellers Say ‘High Risk’ Label from Feds Cuts Off Banking Options, Restricts Business

FK – There’s nothing “amazing” about it. We’re at war. The “Liberal”(commie) trash and their elite masters are waging war on the common people. The bigger question is what is the ‘No Rights that aren’t Allowed’ group gonna do about it? When will they develop the collective backbone to help organize, train and arm the militias for what will be required?

Minnesotans Score Small Victory in Civil Asset Forfeiture War

The number of those caught up in such illegal confiscations is legion. For instance, Tan Nguyen was driving home from Las Vegas, Nevada, with about $50,000 in cash, which he had won during his visits to several casinos. He was pulled over by officer Lee Dove for driving three miles an hour over the speed limit. The officer searched his car and found the cash, which he confiscated. When Nguyen protested, Dove threatened to seize and tow his car, leaving him stranded in the Nevada desert unless he “got in his car and drove off and forgot that this ever happened.” It was a daylight highway robbery and Nguyen sued.

A settlement was reached last week, and Humboldt County, Nevada, returned his money along with an extra $10,000 to pay for his legal expenses. IJ noted that Nevada’s current system allows police officers such as Lee Dove to “seize property under a legal standard lower than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard used in criminal convictions.” In its “Policing for Profit” report, IJ also gives Nevada a rating of “D.”

In Virginia, a state police officer stopped Victor Luis Guzman for speeding on I-95 and confiscated $28,500 from him without charging him with any crime. The fact that he was transporting cash donations from his church didn’t matter. He had to sue to get the church’s money back.

In Florida, there is a stretch of highway now known as a “forfeiture corridor” on I-95 in Volusia County. Two “law enforcement” officers, Bob Vogel and Bill Smith, turned that stretch of highway into their own personal casino, with Vogel raking in more than $6.5 million before being caught. Two hours north on I-95, in Camden County, Georgia, Smith turned his “forfeiture corridor” into a $20 million payout over the past 20 years, using some of the money to buy himself a $90,000 Dodge Viper and build a “party house” for his friends.

FK – Such trash should be hunted and shot on sight.

GOA Calls for Resignation of VA Secretary Eric Shinseki

“The most recent reports now list that number [of disarmed veterans] around 175,000.” — Human Events, March 23, 2014

Within the past week, Gun Owners of America received an e-mail from a member being treated by the VA (Department of Veterans Affairs).  The member was also receiving Social Security benefits, and Social Security had appointed a guardian to manage his financial affairs.

The member wrote us because the VA, based on the Social Security guardian, was moving to take his guns away.

Although it is Standard Operating Procedure for the VA to appoint its own guardians and use this to justify its gun ban on more than 175,000 veterans, it now appears to us that the VA is searching for new “gun ban excuses” to strip even more veterans of their constitutional rights.

FK – Hanging of traitors by the county militia force should be standard procedure by now but we exist in a nation of cowardly whores.

North Korea criticizes U.S. for insufficiently oppressive gun laws

North Korea is one of the most brutally oppressive dictatorships in human history, so it’s certainly not surprising that the government is critical of the idea of allowing the people access to firearms. When you are condemned by North Korea, you know you have earned the honor of being despised by the despicable. And the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence has found another ally to add to the list in advocacy of a “government monopoly on force”–everybody wins.

FK – Gee, one might think Amerikans would get a clue what their blood domestic enemies’ real intentions are. See my column below.