https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cDKlla1_iM

FK – He should stay in the Senate where he can do more good. If he tries to make any serious change in the offal office they’ll kill him. Better to let Hitlery win next time. That witch is so repulsive it will turn millions more against the amerikan communist insurgency, keep the republicrats off the golf course, sell more guns and ammo, and maybe enough will finally see our desperate need for an extensive and thorough “Liberal”(commie) trash season.

Unless reforms are “irreversible,” warns Barber, people might undo what’s been done because they will “wish for the past.” Thus he tells policy makers to “work on the culture and the minds of teachers and parents.”

According to Barber, education reform is a “global phenomenon,” no longer to be managed by individuals or sovereign countries. Education reform has “no more frontiers, no more barriers,” he said at a British Education Summit last August.

FK – Time to get the kids out of the government schools and form neighborhood schools.

The UN document, while packed with contradictory machinations, essentially outlines what establishment proponents of global government have long described as a “New World Order.” In essence, the UN panel called for a top-down restructuring of human civilization under the guise of tackling poverty, “unsustainable” activities, and “climate change.” The international outfit and its mostly dictatorial member regimes will set the agenda, with regional, national, and sub-national governments expected to foist it on humanity.

Literally every person on Earth must submit and contribute, the planetary establishment claimed on multiple occasions in the radical document. It was not immediately clear what would happen with those who refuse

FK – Good luck with that. Remember, they always over-reach, and take temporary satisfaction in achieving part of their goals, coming back later for the rest leading to inter-generational acceptance, indoctrination, adaptation and enslavement.

We can see the absurdity of the Heritage position by considering the actual relationship between the NSA and the city of Bluffdale, Utah. The state constitution allows its political subdivisions to run public utilities. Under this provision, Bluffdale serves as a water supplier. When the NSA proposed building a new data center in the city, Bluffdale negotiated a sweetheart deal to sell water to the agency. Notice an important point: the federal government had to negotiate a contract for water. Now, would Heritage suggest that had the city declined to enter into an agreement to sell water, it was acting unconstitutionally because it was impeding the NSA’s plans? Would Heritage suggested that absent a contract to purchase water, the federal government could simply come in and seize water from Bluffdale? Of course not. The very existence of a contract implies the freedom of both parties to enter into and end the relationship.

The city was always free to supply water or not supply water. And it remains free to supply water or not supply water. As a political subdivision of the state, Bluffdale is subject to state control. So, the state maintains the authority to prohibit its political subdivision from supplying its resources to the NSA. Simply put, the NSA can’t just take the water. So, if the state decides to decline all material support to the NSA moving forward, that would legally begin the process of turning off the water.

FK – “…NSA can’t just take the water?”

Someone should ask the ‘native Americans’ and the southern states what the Federal government can’t take when it decides to.

Don’t understand? Start here.

FK – Or maybe the whole thing is just another distraction. We need to focus on taking our country back so we can hold the treason/war crimes trials and figure out who we need to hang.

HB2807, known as the “Oklahoma Community Protection Act,” would prohibit any state agency or political subdivision from adopting or implementing “policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe upon or restrict private property rights without due process.”

It also would void any previous commitments which may have been made under Agenda 21 or a similar program.

“You don’t need to keep it plugged in and you can share the data easily from a remote location. So it potentially has a lot more impact and some very compelling use cases in developing countries, and we’re really excited about the prospect of the way people will use it. As far as initial traction for the product though, we’re also excited about how it will be used in the North America and Europe, because of the impact it can have in influencing people’s personal lives.

FK – One wonders how long til commie care makes such tech mandatory…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHZLK6xEndQ

FK – We can hope they’re right…

Gun owners nationwide should not dismiss this as a purely local matter — the tactics involved, using a “home rule” facade to establish a patchwork quilt of impossible to comply with restrictions, is one that gun-banners attempt wherever they can. If they can gain a foothold in places like the Green Mountain State, long known for relatively few infringements on firearms freedoms, and the pioneer locale for “Vermont carry,” they will press their advantage wherever they are able. And that includes reversing themselves and using state and federal edicts to erode home rule freedoms when it suits their purposes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNXvZncnkVQ

FK – I will say “I told you so, long ago, before the tea parties were cool.” May the apathetic suffer horribly in this world for their willful ignorance.