Pastors And Churches Violating First Commandment

Do you want to know why pastors will not speak out against the evil practices, policies, and pontifications of our elected civil magistrates? It is the fear of violating the 501c3 statute and thereby risk losing the precious government benefit of tax exemption. Is not this tantamount to what the Pharisees did? They rejected the authority of Christ for fear of losing the benefits of Caesar.

As this column already sounds preachy to my non-Christian readers, I will go ahead and quote this passage from John 11:48: “If we [the Pharisees] let him [Christ] thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and our nation.”

Apply this verse to many of today’s pastors: “If we preach Christ alone, the government in Washington, D.C., will come and take away our tax exempt status and our position and benefits.”

Watch this: the Pharisees rejected the person and authority of Christ for fear of the retribution of Rome. And some thirty-plus years after rejecting Christ, the Romans came in 70 A.D. and completely destroyed the Pharisees as an institution, their synagogue, their power, their riches, everything–just as Jesus predicted in Matthew 24.

FK – While I admire what he’s trying to do I think it’s time to be done with kings and lords. That’s part of the problem, along with sitting around waiting for the world to end.

 

CFR Tells Federal Reserve To Give Away Money?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdh-W-Eql9E

FK – Unfortunately most are in the ‘don’t give a damn and never will stage.’ Then we have the “Oh, this contradicts my lifelong efforts to sit on my ass and wait for the world to end so it doesn’t matter,” stage.

Lie to them about what you are and take their money anyway and buy more ammo.

2014 Deer Season Outlook

FK – A country boy can survive, until they all start doing it. Then we’ll be back to ‘possums, coons, squirrels and skunks like our ancestors. Don’t worry dear citiots, most of your ancestors came from the country at some time and ate the same thing, whatever they could get their hands on.

Better to organize, arm and train to take our country back before there’s nothing left to take back. Leave the hidey holes to the cowards among us.

Most gun owners appear unaware of or indifferent to gun group merger

If that’s true, the scarcity of comments, on the “pro-deal” pieces, bringing gun owners information they have not heard before, leads to the disturbing conclusion that the pro-gun community just doesn’t care that much about what happens to JPFO one way or the other, leading back to an observation I made in my first Gun Rights Examiner piece: “The inescapable conclusion is, had gun owners stepped up and supported a group struggling after the passing of its founder, its rescue would have been unneeded.”

“Wow. Way to blame others for the group’s failure,” one critic of that observation responded in comments. “I might suggest that a lack of support stems from a perception that JPFO isn’t getting much done.”

I might suggest that perception stems from someone who does not recognize the value of the unique lessons JPFO alone provides, and that if his opinion had merit, a shrewd businessman like Alan Gottlieb would have no interest in assuming the costs of turning the group’s fortunes around. I might suggest a person who makes a comment like that has spent very little time seeing what it is JPFO does have to offer, and on helping to support its mission.

I might also suggest that a comment posted on a message board in response to Wolfe’s initial piece reflects an even more troubling issue.

“I skimmed through the article and still have no idea what SAF and JPFO means,” the forum member wrote.

FK – I often meet ‘gun owners’ who’ve never heard of GOA much less SAF, JPFO or any of the numerous smaller state orgs. out there. The average sheeple only allocates a tiny percentage of it’s brain power to really thinking about politics in any way. Our enemies know this. BTW, I don’t doubt our enemies long ago infiltrated the ‘No Rights that aren’t Allowed’ group if they didn’t found it to begin with. At best it’s a rich boys club despite their claims of members supporting it 20 bucks as a time or whatever. Most of its members obviously don’t understand the dire situation we are in or what will be required. It’s not that I haven’t been trying. But telling some people the truth is like saying the emperor has no clothes, when acknowledging such might endanger someone’s mortgage, bass boat, 50″ flat screen or NASCAR tickets.

Rejecting The Rule Of Law Means Inviting The Rule Of Guns

So what happens when the government is not restrained by law? What happens first is that the government does what it wants, as it wants, without accountability. That provides those left unprotected by the law two ugly choices. On one hand, they can submit, and allow themselves to be oppressed, existing at the pleasure, and subject to the whims, of their masters.

The alternative is to fight. Look at the Declaration of Independence. It’s largely a chronicle of English lawlessness, though the members of this administration no doubt consider that document unworthy of study because the Founding Fathers were cisgender, phallocentric racists or something.

Chairman Mao, who is a big favorite of the half-wits in the White House, said it best: “Power comes from the barrel of a gun.” If there is no law, there is no moral reason not to pick up a rifle and take what you want. The moral imperative of the law is that you will obey and respect it even if you disagree with it because it was justly imposed and will be fairly enforced. But if the law is neither justly imposed nor fairly enforced, that moral obligation disappears.

FK – Gee, what’s taking so many so long to wake up to reality? I realized what would be required many years ago.