https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t32D1_ixk3I

FK – Done a couple years back I suppose. Notice how the last segment is politicized. Some interesting stuff none the less.

There is one rule concerning this topic: You don’t blindly trust the first bunch that present themselves nor the second bunch nor the 2,002nd bunch. Got it?

But then every presidential election cycle proves millions don’t ‘get it.’ We’re a long way from being ready for whatever ‘higher level’ some think is almost here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAQ9nBTQ_0E

FK – Monitoring to judge the effectiveness of the propaganda?

The Military’s Spending Millions to Build Robots with Morals

Feds Spending $10 Million to Build Robot Companions for Children

FK – We need robots for politicians, to teach them morals and to permanently ‘correct’ them when they don’t show any.

The Russian government has finally realized that it has no Western “partners,” and is complaining bitterly about the propagandistic lies and disinformation issued without any evidence whatsoever against the Russian government by Washington, its European vassals, and presstitute media.

Perhaps the Russian government thought that only Iraq, Libya, Syria, China, and Edward Snowden would be subjected to Washington’s lies and demonization.

It was obvious enough that Russia would be next.

The Russian government and Europe need to look beyond Washington’s propaganda, because the reality is much worst.

NATO commander General Breedlove and Senate bill 2277 clearly indicate that Washington is organizing itself and Europe for war against Russia (see my previously posted column).

FK – The beast is here already…

Complaints about information overload, usually couched in terms of the overabundance of books, have a long history — reaching back to Ecclesiastes 12:12 (“of making books there is no end,” probably from the 4th or 3rd century BC).  The ancient moralist Seneca complained that “the abundance of books is distraction” in the 1st century AD, and there have been other info-booms from time to time — the building of the Library of Alexandria in the 3rd century BC, or the development of newspapers starting in the 18th century.

The printing press was first developed around 1453; Gutenberg’s new technology moved beyond the experimental phase by 1480 and spread to some two dozen major urban centres, plus there were other short-lived presses in operation from time to time.  Contemporaries at first raved about the great speed with which books could be printed, and also about the drop in price — by 80% on one contemporary’s estimate in 1468.  But around 1500, humanist scholars began to bemoan new problems: printers in search of profit, they complained, rushed to print manuscripts without attention to the quality of the text, and the sheer mass of new books distracted readers from the focus on the ancient authors most worthy of attention.  Printers “fill the world with pamphlets and books that are foolish, ignorant, malignant, libellous, mad, impious and subversive; and such is the flood that even things that might have done some good lose all their goodness,” wrote Erasmus in the early 16th century, in the kind of tirade that might seem familiar to anyone exhausted by what they find online today.

FK – I once read and forwarded or linked to, up to 50 emails, usually long articles, a day. No more.

The ban on carrying of firearms by citizens in the nation’s capitol has been struck down by the United States District Court, District of Columbia, attorney Alan Gura, representing plaintiffs in Palmer vs. District of Columbia announced Saturday.

“In light of Heller, McDonald, and their progeny, there is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny,” Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. wrote in a Memorandum-Decision Order signed Thursday and filed today.

FK – Some good news but the war grinds on… Now New Yawk City must fall. See next:

Court ruling on D.C. carry ban could have broad implications