Court Upholding Ban on Militia-Suitable Firearms Ignores Key Second Amendment Purpose

In poring over the details, the core purpose behind the right — one the court showed deliberate indifference and more to — must not be overlooked. But Judge Blake did her best to make certain that it was.

“[T]he court seriously doubts that the banned assault long guns are commonly possessed for lawful purposes, particularly self-defense in the home, which is at the core of the Second Amendment right, and is inclined to find the weapons fall outside Second Amendment protection as dangerous and unusual,” she declared authoritatively, as if she actually knows what she’s talking about.

Not to diminish its importance, but does that amendment specify “the security of a free Home”?

FK – “Liberal”(commie) trash lies. That’s its purpose and reason for existence. Why we aren’t hunting and eradicating the creatures is beyond my understanding.

More from the same site:

Missouri Senate Protects Open Carry & Guns in Schools From Governor

9 Things New Shooters (and Concealed Carry Permit Holders) Need To Know About Training

Liked it? Take a second to support Barry Bright on Patreon!